Dependence of Cochlear Duct Length Measurement on the Resolution of the Imaging Dataset.

HYPOTHESIS: Measurements of the cochlear duct length (CDL) are dependent on the resolution of the imaging dataset. BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown highly precise cochlear measurements using 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT). Thus far, however, there has been no systematic evaluation of the imaging dataset resolution required for optimal CDL measurement. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the dependence of CDL measurement on the resolution of the imaging dataset to establish a benchmark for future CDL measurements. METHODS: fpVCT scans of 10 human petrous bone specimens were performed. CDL was measured using 3D-curved MPR with secondary reconstruction of the fpVCT scans (fpVCT SECO ) and increasing resolution from 466 to 99 µm. In addition, intraobserver variability was evaluated. A best-fit function for calculation of the CDL was developed to provide a valid tool when there are no measurements done with high-resolution imaging datasets. RESULTS: Comparison of different imaging resolution settings showed significant differences for CDL measurement in most of the tested groups ( p < 0.05), except for the two groups with the highest resolution. Imaging datasets with a resolution lower than 200 µm showed lower intraobserver variability than the other resolution settings, although there were no clinically unacceptable errors with respect to the Bland-Altman plots. The developed best-fit function showed high accuracy for CDL calculation using resolution imaging datasets of 300 µm or lower. CONCLUSION: 3D-curved MPR in fpVCT with a resolution of the imaging dataset of 200 µm or higher revealed the most precise CDL measurement. There was no benefit of using a resolution higher than 200 µm with regard to the accuracy of the CDL measurement.

Comprehension of Cochlear Duct Length for Incomplete Partition Types.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative assessment of the cochlear duct length (CDL) and cochlear dimensions allows the selection of optimized implants. We aimed to evaluate the CDL measurements in incomplete partition (IP) defect patients and to create a reference to the literature. METHODS: Forty-one patients with IP (13 IP I, 23 IP II, and 5 IP III) and 30 controls were included in the study. The standardized cochlear image showing the basal turn in the most expansive plane was reconstructed from temporal high-resolution computed tomography images. Cochlear duct length measured manually (CDL-M) was measured by points placed consecutively on the lateral wall of the cochlea. The defined equations for estimating CDL (CDL measured according to Schurzig et al formula [CDL-Ɵ], CDL measured according to Escudé et al formula [CDL-E], CDL measured according to Alexiades et al formula [CDL-A]) were calculated from the same images. Cochlear duct length mean values obtained by each method were compared for each IP type. RESULTS: The longest CDL value was found in the control group, irrespective of the calculation method. Incomplete partition II cases had the most extended mean CDL among IP types. Incomplete partition III had the shortest CDL among all groups' CDL-M values. However, the mean CDL-M values of IP types I and III showed close results. There was no significant difference between the CDL-E and CDL-M values of the control group. Similarly, no significant difference was found between CDL-Ɵ and CDL-M values in IP type III cases. However, the results of other estimating formulations of all groups differed significantly from CDL-M values. CONCLUSION: Cochlear duct length differences were detected between the control group and IP subtypes. These differences should be considered when choosing the appropriate electrode length. Because the results of formulas estimating CDL may differ from CDL-M in both control and IP cases, it would be more appropriate to use manual measurements in clinical practice.

Two Discrete Types of Tip Fold-Over in Cochlear Implantation Using Slim Modiolar Electrodes: Influence of Cochlear Duct Length on Tip Fold-Over.

OBJECTIVE: Precise electrode positioning is crucial for achieving optimal audiological outcomes in cochlear implantation. The slim modiolar electrode (SME), a thin, flexible, and precurved electrode, exhibits favorable modiolar proximity. However, tip fold-over can affect optimal electrode placement. Herein, we share our experiences with tip fold-over in SMEs and present an analysis of conditions that may predispose to tip fold-over. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. PATIENTS: In total, 475 patients (671 ears) underwent cochlear implantation using SMEs (Nucleus CI532 or CI632 from Cochlear) performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary center between June 14, 2018, and December 1, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative x-ray scans (cochlear view), operative records, and cochlear duct length (CDL) were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tip fold-over patterns on plain x-ray images (proximal versus distal). RESULTS: Electrode tip fold-over was observed in 18 (2.7%) of the 671 ears with SMEs. This fold-over occurred more frequently in cases with long CDL (>36 mm). Among the 14 cases with available initial x-rays before correction of the tip fold-over, half were classified as proximal and the other half as distal. A predilection for proximal tip fold-over was found in those with a CDL of 36 mm or longer, and longer CDLs were observed for proximal cases than for distal cases. Our pilot data suggest that identifying the type of tip fold-over can aid in correcting it more efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Tip fold-over of SME does not occur uniformly and is more common in ears with long CDL. This tendency is particularly pronounced for the proximal type of tip fold-over. Therefore, preoperative measurement of the CDL and meticulous examination of intraoperative imaging are essential for customized correction.

Accuracy of Preoperative Cochlear Duct Length Estimation and Angular Insertion Depth Prediction.

OBJECTIVE: In cochlear implantation with flexible lateral wall electrodes, a cochlear coverage of 70% to 80% is assumed to yield an optimal speech perception. Therefore, fitting the cochlear implant (CI) to the patient's individual anatomy has gained importance in recent years. For these reasons, the optimal angular insertion depth (AID) has to be calculated before cochlear implantation. One CI manufacturer offers a software that allows to visualize the AID of different electrode arrays. Here, it is hypothesized that these preoperative AID models overestimate the postoperatively measured insertion angle. This study aims to investigate the agreement between preoperatively estimated and postoperatively measured AID. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single-center tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION: Preoperative and postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cochlear duct length was estimated by determining cochlear parameters ( A value and B value), and the AID for the chosen electrode was (i) estimated by elliptic circular approximation by the software and (ii) measured manually postoperatively by detecting the electrode contacts after insertion. RESULTS: A total of 80 HRCT imaging data sets from 69 patients were analyzed. The mean preoperative AID estimation was 662.0° (standard deviation [SD], 61.5°), and the mean postoperatively measured AID was 583.9° (SD, 73.6°). In all cases (100%), preoperative AID estimation significantly overestimated the postoperative determined insertion angle (mean difference, 38.1°). A correcting factor of 5% on preoperative AID estimation dissolves these differences. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an electrode visualization tool may lead to shorter electrode array choices because of an overestimation of the insertion angle. Applying a correction factor of 0.95 on preoperative AID estimation is recommended.

[Measuring the cochlea using a tablet-based software package: influence of imaging modality and rater background]. / Vermessung der Cochlea mittels eines Tablet-basierten Softwarepakets: Einfluss der Bildgebungsmodalität und des Untersucherhintergrunds.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear duct length (CDL) is subject to significant individual variation. In the context of cochlear implantation, adapting the electrode array length to the CDL is of potential interest, as it has been associated with improvements in both speech recognition and sound quality. Using a tablet-based software package, it is possible to measure CDL at the level of the organ of Corti (CDLOC) to select appropriate electrode array lengths based on individual cochlear anatomy. OBJECTIVE: To identify effects of imaging modality and rater background on CDL estimates. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) scans of 10 patients (20 cochleae) were analyzed using the OTOPLAN software package (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). Raters were an otorhinolaryngology (ORL) specialist, an ORL resident, and an audiologist. To analyze effects of rater background and imaging modality on CDL measurements, linear mixed models were constructed. RESULTS: Measurements showed mean CDLOC(fpVCT) = 36.69 ± 1.78 mm and CDLOC(MRI) = 36.81 ± 1.87 mm. Analyses indicated no significant effect of rater background (F(2, 105) = 0.84; p = 0.437) on CDL estimates. Imaging modality, on the other hand, significantly affected CDL (F (1, 105) = 20.70; p < 0.001), whereby estimates obtained using MRI were 0.89 mm larger than those obtained using fpVCT. CONCLUSION: No effect of rater background on CDL estimates could be identified, suggesting that comparable measurements could be obtained by personnel other than specially trained neurootologists. While imaging modality (fpVCT vs. MRI) did impact CDL results, the difference was small and of questionable clinical significance.

Difference in cochlear length between male and female patients.

Objective: To compare cochlear duct length (CDL) between male and female patients by evaluating the diameter of the basal turn (distance A) on CT scans.Method: All temporal bone CT scans performed between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed in our medical center. Using multiplanar reconstructions, the length A, which is the greatest distance of the basal turn was measured on both sides. We performed an analysis of variance considering two factors: sex and side. Two different physicians carried out the measurements, an otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist. The patients who had several CT scans allowed us to evaluate the reliability of our procedure.Results: Among the 888 CT scans reviewed, 8 were excluded because of cochlear malformations. The inter-sex difference of length A was found to be 0.29 millimeters(mm) 95% IC [0.26-0.34] and was longer in the male group (p < 0.0001). Using Alexiades' equation, we found that CDL was 34.5mm [34.37-34.61] in the male group and 33.3mm [33.13-33.38] in the female group. When one side was compared to the other, there was no significant difference (p = 0.226). An intra-class correlation found a good absolute agreement between the two screeners of 0.79.Conclusion: Males have a statistically significant longer CDL than females.

[Cochlear Implantation: Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length (CDL)]. / Cochlea-Implantation: Bestimmung der Cochlear Duct Length (CDL).

Personalized care in the context of cochlear implantation is becoming increasingly important. Choosing the right electrode could improve speech understanding. The measurement of the cochlear length plays an important role: preoperatively, in order to select a suitable electrode length; postoperatively, on the one hand to check the correct electrode position, on the other hand to enable anatomically based fitting of the electrode contacts. Of the various possible localizations of the CDL measurements within the cochlear turns, the one on the organ of Corti (CDLOC) is the most frequently used and clinically most important. In the CDL measurement, a direct and indirect evaluation can be distinguished. There is also the possibility of reconstructing and measuring the CDL in 3D and calculating it mathematically, e.g. using spiral equations. In this context, measurements based on radiological imaging are gaining increasing importance. Therefore, if there is the possibility of performing higher-resolution imaging, this should be strived preoperatively in order to enable the most precise possible procedure and thus a good outcome. Otological planning software can help to create an interface between new findings regarding CDL measurement and higher-resolution imaging for an individualized cochlear implantation.

Precise evaluation of the postoperative cochlear duct length by flat-panel volume computed tomography - Application of secondary reconstructions.

OBJECTIVE: There is still a lack in precise postoperative evaluation of the cochlea because of strong artifacts. This study aimed to improve accuracy of postoperative two-turn (2TL) and cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements by applying flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT), secondary reconstruction (fpVCTSECO) and three-dimensional curved multiplanar reconstruction. METHODS: First, 10 temporal bone specimens with or without electrode were measured in multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), fpVCT and fpVCTSECO and compared to high-resolution micro-CT scans. Later, pre- and postoperative scans of 10 patients were analyzed in a clinical setting. RESULTS: Concerning 2TL, no statistically significant difference was observed between implanted fpVCTSECO and nonimplanted micro-CT in 10 temporal bone specimens. In contrast, there was a significant discrepancy for CDL (difference: -0.7 mm, P = 0.004). Nevertheless, there were no clinically unacceptable errors (±1.5 mm). These results could be confirmed in a clinical setting. Using fpVCTSECO, CDL was slightly underestimated postoperatively (difference: -0.5 mm, P = 0.002) but without any clinically unacceptable errors. CONCLUSION: fpVCTSECO can be successfully applied for a precise measurement of the cochlear lengths pre- and postoperatively. However, users must be aware of a slight systematic underestimation of CDL postoperatively. These results may help to refine electrode selection and frequency mapping.

CT imaging-based approaches to cochlear duct length estimation-a human temporal bone study.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge about cochlear duct length (CDL) may assist electrode choice in cochlear implantation (CI). However, no gold standard for clinical applicable estimation of CDL exists. The aim of this study is (1) to determine the most reliable radiological imaging method and imaging processing software for measuring CDL from clinical routine imaging and (2) to accurately predict the insertion depth of the CI electrode. METHODS: Twenty human temporal bones were examined using different sectional imaging techniques (high-resolution computed tomography [HRCT] and cone beam computed tomography [CBCT]). CDL was measured using three methods: length estimation using (1) a dedicated preclinical 3D reconstruction software, (2) the established A-value method, and (3) a clinically approved otosurgical planning software. Temporal bones were implanted with a 31.5-mm CI electrode and measurements were compared to a reference based on the CI electrode insertion angle measured by radiographs in Stenvers projection (CDLreference). RESULTS: A mean cochlear coverage of 74% (SD 7.4%) was found. The CDLreference showed significant differences to each other method (p < 0.001). The strongest correlation to the CDLreference was found for the otosurgical planning software-based method obtained from HRCT (CDLSW-HRCT; r = 0.87, p < 0.001) and from CBCT (CDLSW-CBCT; r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Overall, CDL was underestimated by each applied method. The inter-rater reliability was fair for the CDL estimation based on 3D reconstruction from CBCT (CDL3D-CBCT; intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.43), good for CDL estimation based on 3D reconstruction from HRCT (CDL3D-HRCT; ICC = 0.71), poor for CDL estimation based on the A-value method from HRCT (CDLA-HRCT; ICC = 0.29), and excellent for CDL estimation based on the A-value method from CBCT (CDLA-CBCT; ICC = 0.87) as well as for the CDLSW-HRCT (ICC = 0.94), CDLSW-CBCT (ICC = 0.94) and CDLreference (ICC = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: All approaches would have led to an electrode choice of rather too short electrodes. Concerning treatment decisions based on CDL measurements, the otosurgical planning software-based method has to be recommended. The best inter-rater reliability was found for CDLA-CBCT, for CDLSW-HRCT, for CDLSW-CBCT, and for CDLreference. KEY POINTS: • Clinically applicable calculations using high-resolution CT and cone beam CT underestimate the cochlear size. • Ten percent of cochlear duct length need to be added to current calculations in order to predict the postoperative CI electrode position. • The clinically approved otosurgical planning software-based method software is the most suitable to estimate the cochlear duct length and shows an excellent inter-rater reliability.

Determination of Cochlear Duct Length With 3D Versus Two-dimensional Methods: A Retrospective Clinical Study of Imaging by Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare three different methods for measurement of cochlear duct length (CDL) in the clinical setting for two different imaging modalities, namely computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred temporal bone data sets (CT: n=50; CBCT: n=50) of non-malformed cochleae were retrospectively analyzed using three different CDL estimation techniques: 3D curved multiplanar reconstruction (cMPR), 2D cMPR and the A-value formula. RESULTS: The data sets belonged to 60 patients (34 males, 26 females; mean age=50.28±18.58 years). For both imaging modalities, application of the 3D cMPR estimation technique led to significantly greater mean CDL values than the two-dimensional methods (p<0.0083). The CDL measurements viewed in CT imaging software were significantly shorter than the corresponding CBCT measurements (p<0.05). Using a linear mixed model, differences in CDL by sex (p=0.796), age (p=0.377) and side of ear (p=0.690) were not significant. CONCLUSION: The 3D cMPR technique was found to provide the most accurate in vivo CDL measurement in non-malformed cochlea in both CT and CBCT imaging compared to 2D methods. The study results also suggest that the higher spatial resolution in CBCT imaging results in more precise CDL determination than in CT.

Three-Dimensional Modeling and Measurement of the Human Cochlear Hook Region: Considerations for Tonotopic Mapping.

HYPOTHESIS: Measuring the length of the basilar membrane (BM) in the cochlear hook region will result in improved accuracy of cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant pitch mapping is generally performed in a patient independent approach, which has been shown to result in place-pitch mismatches. In order to customize cochlear implant pitch maps, accurate CDL measurements must be obtained. CDL measurements generally begin at the center of the round window (RW) and ignore the basal-most portion of the BM in the hook region. Measuring the size and morphology of the BM in the hook region can improve CDL measurements and our understanding of cochlear tonotopy. METHODS: Ten cadaveric human cochleae underwent synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging. The length of the BM through the hook region and CDL were measured. Two different CDL measurements were obtained for each sample, with starting points at the center of the RW (CDLRW) and the basal-most tip of the BM (CDLHR). Regression analysis was performed to relate CDLRW to CDLHR. A three-dimensional polynomial model was determined to describe the average BM hook region morphology. RESULTS: The mean CDLRW value was 33.03 ±â€Š1.62 mm, and the mean CDLHR value was 34.68 ±â€Š1.72 mm. The following relationship was determined between CDLRW and CDLHR: CDLHR  = 1.06(CDLRW)-0.26 (R2  = 0.99). CONCLUSION: The length and morphology of the hook region was determined. Current measurements underestimate CDL in the hook region and can be corrected using the results herein.

Computed Tomography-Based Measurements of the Cochlear Duct: Implications for Cochlear Implant Pitch Tuning.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the sources of variability for cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements for the purposes of fine-tuning cochlear implants (CI) and to propose a set of standardized landmarks for computed tomography (CT) pitch mapping. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 21 CI users at a tertiary referral center. The intervention involved flat-panel CT image acquisition and secondary reconstructions of CIs in vivo. The main outcome measures were CDL measurements, CI electrode localization measurements, and frequency calculations. RESULTS: Direct CT-based measurements of CI and intracochlear landmarks are methodologically valid, with a percentage of error of 1.0% ± 0.9%. Round window (RW) position markers (anterior edge, center, or posterior edge) and bony canal wall localization markers (medial edge, duct center, or lateral edge) significantly impact CDL calculations [F(2, 78) = 9.9, p < 0.001 and F(2, 78) = 1806, p < 0.001, respectively]. These pitch distortions could be as large as 11 semitones. When using predefined anatomical landmarks, there was still a difference between researchers [F(2, 78) = 12.5; p < 0.001], but the average variability of electrode location was reduced to differences of 1.6 semitones (from 11 semitones. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of standardization regarding RW and bony canal wall landmarks results in great CDL measurement variability and distorted pitch map calculations. We propose using the posterior edge of the RW and lateral bony wall as standardized anatomical parameters for CDL calculations in CI users to improve pitch map calculations. More accurate and precise pitch maps may improve CI-associated pitch outcomes.

Cochlear duct length and cochlear distance on preoperative CT: imaging markers for estimating insertion depth angle of cochlear implant electrode.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative estimation of the insertion depth angle of cochlear implant (CI) electrodes is essential for surgical planning. The purpose of this study was to determine the cochlear size using preoperative CT and to investigate the correlation between cochlear size and insertion depth angle in morphologically normal cochlea. METHODS: Thirty-five children who underwent CI were included in this study. Cochlear duct length (CDL) and the diameter of the cochlear basal turn (distance A/B) on preoperative CT and the insertion depth angle of the CI electrode on postoperative radiographs were independently measured by two readers. Correlation between cochlear size and insertion depth angle was evaluated. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The mean CDL, distance A, and distance B of 70 ears were 36.20 ± 1.57 mm, 8.67 ± 0.42 mm, and 5.73 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. The mean insertion depth angle was 431.45 ± 38.42°. Interobserver agreements of CDL, distance A/B, and insertion depth angle were fair to excellent (ICC 0.864, 0.862, 0.529, and 0.958, respectively). Distance A (r = - 0.7643) and distance B (r = - 0.7118) showed a negative correlation with insertion depth angle, respectively (p < 0.0001). However, the correlation between CDL and insertion depth angle was not statistically significant (r = - 0.2333, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CDL and cochlear distance can be reliably obtained from preoperative CT. Distance A can be used as a predictive marker for estimating insertion depth angle during CI surgery.

Assessment of Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Tablet-Based Software to Measure Cochlear Duct Length.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to build upon previous work validating a tablet-based software to measure cochlear duct length (CDL). Here, we do so by greatly expanding the number of cochleae (n = 166) analyzed, and examined whether computed tomography (CT) slice thickness influences reliability of CDL measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eighty-three adult cochlear implant recipients were included in the study. Both cochleae were measured for each patient (n = 166). INTERVENTIONS: Three raters analyzed the scans of 166 cochleae at 2 different time points. Each rater individually identified anatomical landmarks that delineated the basal turn diameter and width. These coordinates were applied to the elliptic approximation method (ECA) to estimate CDL. The effect of CT scan slice thickness on the measurements was explored. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure is the strength of the inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: The mean CDL measured was 32.84 ±â€Š2.03 mm, with a range of 29.03 to 38.07 mm. We observed no significant relationship between slice thickness and CDL measurement (F1,164 = 3.04; p = 0.08). The mean absolute difference in CDL estimations between raters was 1.76 ±â€Š1.24 mm and within raters was 0.263 ±â€Š0.200 mm. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between raters was 0.54 and ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 within raters. CONCLUSIONS: This software produces reliable measurements of CDL between and within raters, regardless of CT scan thickness.

A Revised Surgical Approach to Induce Endolymphatic Hydrops in the Guinea Pig.

Endolymphatic hydrops is an enlargement of scala media that is most often associated with Meniere's disease, though the pathophysiologic mechanism(s) remain unclear. In order to adequately study the attributes of endolymphatic hydrops, such as the origins of low-frequency hearing loss, a reliable model is needed. The guinea pig is a good model because it hears in the low-frequency regions that are putatively affected by endolymphatic hydrops. Previous research has demonstrated that endolymphatic hydrops can be induced surgically via intradural or extradural approaches that involve drilling on the endolymphatic duct and sac. However, whether it was possible to create an endolymphatic hydrops model using an extradural approach that avoided dangerous drilling on the endolymphatic duct and sac was unknown. The objective of this study was to demonstrate a revised extradural approach to induce experimental endolymphatic hydrops at 30 days post-operatively by obliterating the endolymphatic sac and injuring the endolymphatic duct with a fine pick. The sample size consisted of seven guinea pigs. Functional measurements of hearing were made and temporal bones were subsequently harvested for histologic analysis. The approach had a success rate of 86% in achieving endolymphatic hydrops. The risk of cerebrospinal fluid leak was minimal. No perioperative deaths or injuries to the posterior semicircular canal occurred in the sample. The presented method demonstrates a safe and reliable way to induce endolymphatic hydrops at a relatively quick time point of 30 days. The clinical implications are that the presented method provides a reliable model to further explore the origins of low-frequency hearing loss that can be associated endolymphatic hydrops.

Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length Measurements From a 3D Analytical Cochlear Model Using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging.

HYPOTHESIS: Evaluating the accuracy of cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements from a published three-dimensional (3D) analytical cochlear model using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging (SR-PCI) data will help determine its clinical applicability and allow for model adjustments to increase accuracy. BACKGROUND: Accurate CDL determination can aid in cochlear implant sizing for full coverage and frequency map programming, which has the potential to improve hearing outcomes in patients. To overcome problems with the currently available techniques for CDL determination, a novel 3D analytical cochlear model, dependent on four basal turn distances, was proposed in the literature. METHODS: SR-PCI data from 11 cadaveric human cochleae were used to obtain reference measurements. CDL values generated by the analytical cochlear model were evaluated in two conditions: when the number of cochlear turns (NCT) were automatically predicted based on the four input distances, and when the NCT were manually specified based on SR-PCI data. RESULTS: When the analytical cochlear model automatically predicted the NCT, the mean absolute error was 2.6 ±â€Š1.6 mm, with only 27% (3/11) of the samples having an error in the clinically acceptable range of ±1.5 mm. When the NCT were manually specified based on SR-PCI data, the mean absolute error was reduced to 1.0 ±â€Š0.6 mm, with 73% (8/11) of the samples having a clinically acceptable error. CONCLUSION: The 3D analytical cochlear model introduced in the literature is effective at modeling the 3D geometry of individual cochleae, however tuning in the NCT estimation is required.

Use of MRI to determine cochlear duct length in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES: It is recognised that CT can be used to determine the cochlear duct length (CDL) when selecting an electrode for cochlear implantation. It is the practice of our institution to routinely use MRI as the sole modality of pre-operative imaging in the assessment of children referred for consideration of cochlear implantation. We therefore wanted to determine whether MRI could be reliably used to determine cochlear duct length. METHODS: An analysis of 40 ears that had undergone MRI and CT of the temporal bones was undertaken. The diameter of the basal turn was independently measured for each ear using the two modalities, and CDL was then calculated. RESULTS: The mean error of measurement was 0.26 mm (range 0-0.8 mm), leading to a difference in calculated CDL of 0.96 mm (range 0-2.92 mm). CDL did not predict full insertion of 28 mm cochlear implant electrodes in 30 ears. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can be used to reliably determine cochlear duct length.

An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

BACKGROUND: There has been renewed interest in the cochlear duct length (CDL) for preoperative cochlear implant electrode selection and postoperative generation of patient-specific frequency maps. The CDL can be estimated by measuring the A-value, which is defined as the length between the round window and the furthest point on the basal turn. Unfortunately, there is significant intra- and inter-observer variability when these measurements are made clinically. The objective of this study was to develop an automated A-value measurement algorithm to improve accuracy and eliminate observer variability. METHOD: Clinical and micro-CT images of 20 cadaveric cochleae specimens were acquired. The micro-CT of one sample was chosen as the atlas, and A-value fiducials were placed onto that image. Image registration (rigid affine and non-rigid B-spline) was applied between the atlas and the 19 remaining clinical CT images. The registration transform was applied to the A-value fiducials, and the A-value was then automatically calculated for each specimen. High resolution micro-CT images of the same 19 specimens were used to measure the gold standard A-values for comparison against the manual and automated methods. RESULTS: The registration algorithm had excellent qualitative overlap between the atlas and target images. The automated method eliminated the observer variability and the systematic underestimation by experts. Manual measurement of the A-value on clinical CT had a mean error of 9.5 ± 4.3% compared to micro-CT, and this improved to an error of 2.7 ± 2.1% using the automated algorithm. Both the automated and manual methods correlated significantly with the gold standard micro-CT A-values (r = 0.70, p < 0.01 and r = 0.69, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: An automated A-value measurement tool using atlas-based registration methods was successfully developed and validated. The automated method eliminated the observer variability and improved accuracy as compared to manual measurements by experts. This open-source tool has the potential to benefit cochlear implant recipients in the future.

Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear Duct Length (CDL) has been an important measure for the development and advancement of cochlear implants. Emerging literature has shown CDL can be used in preoperative settings to select the proper sized electrode and develop customized frequency maps. In order to improve post-operative outcomes, and develop new electrode technologies, methods of measuring CDL must be validated to allow usage in the clinic. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to assess the various techniques used to calculate CDL and provide the reader with enough information to make an informed decision on how to conduct future studies measuring the CDL. RESULTS: The methods to measure CDL, the modality used to capture images, and the location of the measurement have all changed as technology evolved. With recent popularity and advancement in computed tomography (CT) imaging in place of histologic sections, measurements of CDL have been focused at the lateral wall (LW) instead of the organ of Corti (OC), due to the inability of CT to view intracochlear structures. After analyzing results from methods such as directly measuring CDL from histology, indirectly reconstructing the shape of the cochlea, and determining CDL based on spiral coefficients, it was determined the three dimensional (3D) reconstruction method is the most reliable method to measure CDL. 3D reconstruction provides excellent visualization of the cochlea and avoids errors evident in other methods. Due to the number of varying methods with varying accuracies, certain guidelines must be followed in the future to allow direct comparison of CDL values between studies. CONCLUSION: After summarizing and analyzing the interesting history of CDL measurements, the use of standardized guidelines and the importance of CDL for future cochlear implant developments is emphasized for future studies.

Automatic Cochlear Duct Length Estimation for Selection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

HYPOTHESIS: Cochlear duct length (CDL) can be automatically measured for custom selection of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays. BACKGROUND: CI electrode array selection can be influenced by measuring the CDL, which is estimated based on the length of the line that connects the round window and the lateral wall of the cochlea when passing through the modiolus. CDL measurement remains time consuming and inter-observer variability has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluate an automatic approach to directly measure the two-turn (2T) CDL using existing algorithms for localizing cochlear anatomy in computed tomography (CT). Pre-op CT images of 309 ears were evaluated. Two fellowship-trained neurotologists manually and independently measured CDL. Inter-observer variability between measurements across expert and automatic observers is assessed. Inter-observer differences for choice of electrode type are also investigated. RESULTS: Manual measurement of CDL by experts tends to underestimate cochlea size and has high inter-observer variability, with mean absolute differences between expert CDL estimations of 1.15 mm. Our results show that this can lead to a large number of cochleae for which a different electrode array type would be selected by different observers, depending on the specific threshold value of CDL used to decide between array type. CONCLUSION: Choosing the best CI electrode array is an important task for optimizing hearing outcomes. Manual cochleae length measurements are user-dependent, and errors impact upon the CI electrode array choice for certain patients. Measuring cochlea length automatically is less time consuming and generates more repeatable results. Our automatic approach could make use of CDL for patient-customized treatment more clinically adoptable.